● HOME
● PENTAGON FRAUD
● WTC DEMOLITION
● PILOT IRONY
● FAKE BIN LADEN
● FAMILIES DEMANDS
● VIEW PETITION
● FLIGHT 93 SCAM
● GOV SEEDS
● 911 STORE
● ABOUT US
● DONATE / SUPPORT
● 911 BLOG
● LINKS

Just for starters, 9-11 represented the first collapse of ANY steel-framed building, allegedly from fire. Optimum Flame Temperature of Propane 3500°F, yet your BBQ doesn't melt or collapse when you grill.  If you believe Jet fuel can demolish a building with the precision of a demolition team, I submit to you that you are 100% incorrect and urge you to look at the evidence and scientific facts.  Seven of 8 airline black-boxes were destroyed that day, yet we are supposed to believe the passport of Satam Al Suqami flew out of his pocket, through the fire, and landed intact in the streets below?  Leave a Message for 911Lies

Precision symmetrical implosion is an impossibility of nature.  And the fact that 3 high-carbon-steel-reinforced- core modern skyscrapers collapsed in this fashion due to random chaotic events is ridiculous.  This clearly shows 4 corners collapsing simultaneously. Note the symmetrical explosions on the floors below just before the upper section starts to freefall. You can see the explosions come out as the central core columns are cut.  Thermate, is like a sparkler that slices through steel.  No natural degradation of structural integrity could result in such a perfect implosion. Most spectacularly, no ‘official’ questions were asked about WTC #7! Before impact, something appears from nowhere onto the left side of the World Trade Center, and as the plane gets closer, the object moves across the building about 70% across, and then the plane hits just beneath it. It then dances onto the fireball, then onto a buildings face more than a mile away in an instant!  What could it be? This object was invisible to the people, it's only picked up by a few cameras that had IR, built in capabilities, and the Camera's actually picked it up, though this was invisible to any bystanders or people in other buildings.  More Video Here The Picture (left) is a section from the the actual FEMA photograph below, and proves, the fire from the jet fuel had already burned up within minutes, and left no significant heat. Firefighters confirm this.  See what the firefighters and first-responders say here.  The woman is circled in white, she was identified, did not survive. It is a simple scientific fact, that the steel could not be hot enough to cause a complete collapse, and cool enough to lean against.  The government is lying, wake up.  Sign the petition to release evidence. VIEW PETITION

View of a Military Expert: Why the Towers of the World Trade Center collapsed The airplanes did not a have true effect on the destruction of towers; they were needed to give an excuse for odd Orwellian wars at the same time when the USA is turned into a police nation, like the German Third Reich, to some extent. The towers took the impacts of crushing Boeing 767's. The towers were originally built to take impacts of Boeing 707's, which are approximately of the same size and was widely used in the 1970's. Fires that kindled from the fuel in the planes were too shortlasting and weak to be able to severely damage the structure of the skyscrapers. Even in the extreme situation, the heat from a kerosene fire cannot threat the durability of a steel trunk. With the temperature of carbohydrate fires that reaches only 825 °C (approx. 1517 °F) steel weakens at 800 °C (approx. 1470 °F) and melts at 1585 °C (approx. 2890 °F). In the skyscrapers of the WTC the surroundings were not at all ideal as there were far too many steel columns and they led heat away from the burning area. WTC 1 burned for 102 minutes and WTC 2 for 56 minutes only. A fire burning much longer, from 10 to 20 hours, could slowly increase the burning temperature down to perhaps 1100 °C (approx. 2010 °F). Provided there is more substance to burn, such a fire will damage concrete and irons, but not severely heavy steel constructions.     In mid-February in Madrid, the Windsor Tower (left) burned for over 20 hours, which led to a fire stronger and hotter than that in the WTC, but even the collapses of the Windsor Tower caused by the very strong and long-enduring fire were minimal and limited to the upper floors. If either of the WTC tower had started to collapse because of fires the collapse would have been limited to only a few of the floors and then stopped. The impossibility of a gravitational collapse is closer seen in other documents. A collapse would produce large pieces, and does not explain reports of fine dust from concrete, huge amounts of dust and pieces of steel ejected outwards. Destruction of the towers by explosions is clear according to the photographs and reports of the eye witnesses. In the picture below, a range of cutting charges have just exploded in the down left sector and a typical white cloud is formed outwards from the wall. Down right, explosions are seen as well. Even a flame is seen. Leave a Message for 911Lies   In video tapes taken of the so-called collapses of the WTC, more explosions of these cutting charges can be seen. The explosions advance quickly, with a gap of a couple of floors, cutting the strong steel pillars in the outer wall. The explosions are timed so that it appears that the tower collapses occur in the same timing as in a gravitational collapse. The explosions are not completely synchronized in timing, probably a few charges are triggered by radio, and other charges explode out of the impulses of one of these charges (infrared, pressure wave). More challenging problems to the demolition men, however, were the central cores of the buildings and the 47 steel pillars more robust than the ones on the outer rounds. The pillars of the central cores were made of steel even 100 + 100 mm thick, thicker than the side armours of a battle tank. Cutting those, even with explosives, is extremely difficult. One would need to surround the whole pillars, every single pillar on every floor intended to get blasted, with powerful cutting charges. These charges would have needed to be placed in such a way that the users of the skyscrapers could not notice these preparations. As seen in the following pictures, the cores of the towers were not distracted by thousands of powerful cutting charges but by a modern thermonuclear explosive, a small hydrogen bomb. In the picture below, a hydrogen bomb explosion, the bomb having been placed in the cellar and directed to the core, has reached the roof of the tower and the upper parts of the outer walls. On its way up the waves of fire pressure partially penetrated about 100 floors of concrete and steel. Over ten million degrees of heat caused by a hydrogen bomb sublimised all water within the concrete in a moment. Water exploded extremely quickly into 1000-fold volume and totally pulverized the concrete.   Even people and computers that were in the buildings disappeared turning into heat and light. That is why almost nothing of them was found in the ruins. Burning radiation is absorbed in steel so quickly that steel heats up immediately over its melting point 1585 °C (approx. 2890 °F) and above its boiling point around 3000 C (approx. 5430 °F). In the pictures down below, super hot groups of steel pillars and columns, torn from wall by pressure wave, are sublimized. They immediately turn into a vaporized form, binding heat as quickly as possible. Bursts upwards, even visible in the picture below, are not possible for a gravitational collapse or for cutting charges which are used horizontally. From SuanaLahti.net         Storax Sedan 104 Kt shallow underground. In the picture to the left, the explosion is in theory, 100 times stronger than in the picture below, but in practice the difference is only four times due to the capability of direction of the small hydrogen bomb.           WTC In the picture at the right, the brown shades caused by a hydrogen bomb are seen, while the top of the tower that is already collapsing is breaking down and the posture straightens up as the hydrogen bomb pulverized the core and it lost all its resistance. The piles point the blasts of the cutting charges. Note the steel, turned to dust in front of your very eyes.   Steel pillars are turned into dust.  Extremely hot, sublimating pieces are not created with many methods.              For comparison, pictures of subterranean nuclear explosions where the explosion is blasting onto surface and into the air. Ess1.2 Kt             Banberry 10 Kt underground WTCII Radioactivity in air creates shades of brown. (The subterranean nuke in the picture on the right is 10 times stronger than the small nuke on the left.) This is the reason why the FBI did not search the crime scene. Ground zeros of nuclear weapons are a health risk and belong to the FEMA.

So not only is the planes identity put into question by this extra equipment on it's fuselage, but it's origin is now in question as well.		There is clearly an extra piece of non standard equipment which has been attached to this planes fuselage, which is alleged to have been Flight 175. There has not been one single photograph found, showing this plane to have passenger windows. And many eyewitness accounts declaring as much, that this plane was not a commercial passenger plane, and that it had no windows. One of them was Mark Burnback, a Fox News employee.
		It is obvious after a closer look at all the news networks own footage from the day, that there is an extra piece of hardware, which has been added onto the fuselage. No plane with such a large extra piece of equipment mounted to its fuselage, could ever have taken off from Boston's Logan International that morning. Possible missile exiting the WTC. An engine would flail around like a bottle-rocket without a stick. This is a precise undeviating lineal projectile, and it's trailing exhaust / smoke.
		Are we supposed to believe that this is a natural result from airplanes hitting the upper floors in random places? The biggest buildings in the world, 110 floors apiece digging their own graves instead of toppling over? Does this look like right to  you? High rise buildings imploding into the ground with demolition precision? Leave a Message for 911Lies

		A hot, vigorous fire would have blown out many windows in the building and would have burned a red or white color. This was not what happened. The fire in the World Trade Center was an ordinary smoldering office fire, as you see people escaping smoke, not heat. 'Weakening' of a steel structure in any capacity is NOT uniform, and could not result in a free-fall symmetrical collapse of any structure. Holmes Theory of Deduction: "When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however improbable, must be the truth" If you think It's possible for jet-fuel to collapse steel skyscrapers with demolition precision and symmetry 3 times in 1 day, you are either: 1) Insane 2) In Denial 3) Working for the neo-cons to perpetrate this lie
		Does this look right to you? The WTC core-columns 'cut' like carrot sticks? It clearly shows the core columns were 'cut' by explosives. Thermite / Thermate.  The evidence of explosives is absolute. How do steel columns 'weakened by heat' end up cut with precision accuracy at the same level on every column? Jet Fuel temp 1,140° Minimum Melting point of Poor Grade Steel 2,500°
		Their were explosives in the building, firefighters confirm this. So, if the WTC was brought down by explosives, you're probably wondering how they get there?

Weeks before 911, the WTC 1 and 2 had a series of bizarre security evacuations. 
This can be validated by numerous sources. 

They even cut the electricity within the entire buildings.
(many witnesses can validate this, just 'Google' it)
Something that had NEVER been done in the existence of the towers. 
According to security personnel, bomb-sniffing dogs were also pulled from the WTC!

So, on who's authority did such events take place?  Good Question.
Under the authority of the presidents brother, MARVIN Bush.
 

Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called 'Securacom' .Securacom provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm, on whose board Marvin Bush also served. [Utne] According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the buildings fell down.

As your eyes will tell you, the World Trade Centers collapses looked like controlled demolitions.  Below is WTC #7 Falling like a rock.  Here's the proof.
 

Do you honestly believe this collapse you are seeing is natural, and not the result of planned precision demolition?  This alone should convince you that the 911 Commission report is a lie.

According to the law of gravity, it is possible to calculate the time it takes for an object to fall a given distance. The equation is H=(1/2)at2.
H=height
a=acceleration of gravity (10 meters per second squared)
t=time in seconds
 

The top floors aren't being demolished, they are being VAPORIZED.  Everything above the cloud segmentation is turning to dust, while all below awaits termination

Plug in the height of the building at 1,350 feet (411 meters) and we get 9 seconds. That is just about the length of time it took for the very top of the World Trade Center to fall to the street below. According to all reports, the whole thing was over in just about ten seconds.

It is as if the entire building were falling straight down through thin air. As if the entire solid structure below, the strong part which had not been burned or sliced or harmed in any significant way, just disappeared into nothingness. Yet this (within a small tolerance) is what we would expect to find if there had been a controlled demolition, because the explosions below really do leave the upper stories completely unsupported. The entire building pauses a moment, then goes straight down.

Any kind of viscous process or friction process should have slowed the whole thing down. Like dropping a lead ball into a vat of molasses, or dropping a feather into the air, gravitational acceleration cannot achieve its full effect if it is fighting any opposing force. In the case of the World Trade Center, the intact building below should have at least braked the fall of the upper stories. This did not happen. There was no measurable friction at all.  This proves controlled demolition.

No kerosene fire can burn hot enough to melt steel. In point of fact, most of the fuel in the jets was contained in their wing tanks. The thin aluminum of the tanks was pierced or stripped as the airplanes penetrated the walls of the towers, and the result was the huge fireball which was seen on national TV, where most of this fuel was burned.
 

		Hydrogen  Explosion In Nevada Note Cauliflower shaped cloud.
		The WTC Explosion Note Cauliflower shaped cloud.

This is not one of the towers, this is a nearby building.  What you are seeing is a huge chunk of the WTC that has been blown away, and crashed into the neighboring building. Not consistent with the official story that heat collapsed the structures.

 

- Official "9/11 Commission" Report (2004) "A jet fuel fireball erupted upon impact and shot down at least one bank of elevators."  Not according to firefighters that were in the buildings.

BBC Finds Alleged Hijackers Alive and Well  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1558669.stm September, 2001, 20:41 GMT 21:41 UK.  “Hijack 'suspects' alive and well”, Sunday, 23 September, 2001, 12:30 GMT 13:30 UK. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
		Within hours, a massive media campaign to blame the attacks on Arabs, and specifically on Osama Bin Laden begins. FAKE BIN LADEN  This campaign has continued to the present day. Our traditional American form of government, unfortunately, may not survive -- the Patriot Act appears poised to supersede the Bill of Rights. But, let's take a look at these supposed hijackers. There is plenty of evidence to suggest some were actually on the CIA payroll and had CIA ties. Even more ominous, is the fact that at least nine (the nine highlighted faces) are still alive.

Badr Mohammed H. Hazmi, a San Antonio radiologist under arrest as a material witness, has used the alias of Khalid Al-Midhar, who is listed by the FBI as a hijacker on the flight that struck the Pentagon, according to documents distributed to law enforcement agencies. [Washington Post] Three pictures of Almihdhar shown by the media.  [Cox News Service] Eight days after the planes went down, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. distributed a "special alert" to its member banks asking for information about 21 "alleged suspects" in the attacks. The list said "Al-Midhar, Khalid Alive," raising the possibility that the real Almihdhar never died on the plane. But one Justice Department official called the listing a "typo." While the FBI's confusion over Arabic names and identities was largely ignored in the American press, each blunder has made huge news in Saudi Arabia, casting doubt on U.S. intentions and convincing many Saudis that their country has been slandered. "I want to think all this is a mistake," said a bewildered Khalid al-Mihammadi, 24, a computer programmer from Mecca who was named wrongfully in an early list of hijackers released by the U.S. Justice Department. "We are America's friends, and they do this to us. It isn't fair." Al-Mihammadi, who spent nine months studying English in the U.S., said he was watching television at home when shaken friends saw his photograph on the news and began to call to see if he was still alive. [Chicago Tribune] 2. Majed Moqed: Possible Saudi national. Aliases: Majed M. GH Moqed; Majed Moqed, Majed Mashaan Moqed.